👾 Inference vs. Training: What's the difference?

Introduction: The Hidden Dualism of Artificial Intelligence

When ChatGPT took the world by storm at the end of 2022, millions of people experienced the impressive ability of artificial intelligence to generate human-like texts for the first time. What most users didn't see, however, was the massive infrastructure and complex process that made this digital miracle possible in the first place. We interact with AI systems every day - be it through voice assistants, recommendation algorithms or automatic translations - but what we experience is just the tip of a technological iceberg.

There are two fundamentally different phases behind every AI application: Training and Inference. These terms not only mark technical differences, but also represent completely different working methods, resource requirements and challenges. While training resembles a demanding educational process in which an AI system first develops its “intelligence”, inference corresponds to the practical application of this acquired knowledge - similar to a student who applies their knowledge in professional practice after years of study.

But how exactly do these two phases differ? Why does the training of modern AI models cost millions, while inference can be comparatively cheap? And what significance does this dual system have for the future of AI development? We get to the bottom of these questions in this article.

Two Sides of the Same Coin

The Training Phase: The Costly Foundation

At the heart of every powerful AI lies a complex training process. Imagine a newborn child having to read several million books, look at billions of images and analyze countless examples of human communication within a few weeks - that comes amazingly close to AI training. And the training costs are growing rapidly.

What Happens During Training?

During training, a neural network “learns” by gradually adapting its internal parameters. A modern Large Language Model such as GPT-4 can contain over 1.7 trillion parameters - each of which is a value that needs to be optimized through training. The process typically works like this:

1. Data collection and processing: First of all, massive amounts of data are collected - often trillions of words from the Internet, books and other sources in the case of language models.

2. Initialization: The parameters of the model are set randomly - at this point the model only produces nonsense.

3. Forward pass: The model receives an input text and tries to predict the next word segment.

4. Error calculation: The prediction is compared with the actual text. The difference is referred to as the error or “loss”.

5. Backpropagation: The error is propagated back through the network, and an algorithm called Gradient Descent calculates how the parameters should be adjusted to reduce the error.

6. Parameter update: The parameters are adjusted accordingly.

7. Repetition: These steps are repeated billions of times, with the model slowly making better and better predictions.

The numbers behind this process are impressive: Training GPT-4 is estimated to have cost between $50 and $100 million and required several months of computing time on thousands of specialized GPU clusters. The energy consumption of such a training process is equivalent to the annual electricity consumption of hundreds of households.

Why Is Training So Resource-Intensive?

A key reason for the high costs is the sheer volume of data and computational complexity. Training requires not only trillions of calculations, but also the computation and storage of gradients for each parameter. This requires enormous storage and computing capacity that can only be provided by specialized hardware.

In addition, training requires highly parallelized hardware with precise synchronization. Modern AI training often uses distributed computing, requiring hundreds of GPUs to work together in a coordinated manner—a technical challenge that requires specialized infrastructure and software.

The Inference Phase: Knowledge In Action

In contrast to laborious training is inference—the process by which a previously trained model applies its learned skills to respond to new inputs. This is the part we experience as end users: when we ask ChatGPT a question, receive an image caption from DALL-E, or have DeepL translate a text.

The Inference Process In Detail:

1. Input: The system receives a request—such as a text prompt, an image, or an audio file.

2. Forward pass: The input is passed through the neural network, but unlike training, no errors are calculated and no parameters are updated.

3. Output: The model generates a response based on its learned parameters.

With a language model like ChatGPT, this happens step by step: the model generates a word, adds it to the conversation, and then uses this expanded conversation to predict the next word—a process called "autoregressive generation."

The Economic Dimension: Cost Distribution and Business Models

The different requirements of training and inference also shape the economics and business models of the AI ​​industry. While training requires enormous capital investment and is therefore primarily carried out by large technology companies or well-funded research organizations, inference is significantly more accessible.

Inference costs per query have continuously declined in recent years, favoring the widespread availability of AI applications. This enables new business models: Small companies can license pre-trained models and develop specialized applications based on them without having to perform the costly training themselves.

The different requirements are also reflected in the hardware landscape: While NVIDIA GPUs with high computing power dominate for training, a diversified market is emerging for inference, with specialized chips from companies such as Intel (Gaudi), Google (TPU), and various startups that are optimized for energy efficiency and cost reduction.

Current Challenges and Developments

The fundamental division between training and inference remains, but the boundaries are becoming increasingly blurred by new approaches:

Continual Learning: Modern systems are increasingly implementing methods that allow models to continue learning even after initial training without having to be completely retrained.

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG): Instead of storing all information in the model parameters, AI systems can consult external knowledge sources – an approach that improves timeliness and enables smaller base models.

Fine-Tuning and Transfer Learning: Pre-trained base models are retrained for specific tasks – a process that is significantly more efficient than full training but goes beyond simple inference.

One of the most exciting developments is "on-device training," in which limited training steps can be performed directly on end devices such as smartphones to adapt models to individual users without having to transfer sensitive data – an important step for data protection and personalization.

On the other hand, researchers are working on "one-shot inference" and "in-context learning," where models can learn from a few examples without explicit training—capabilities that can already be observed in rudimentary form in today's LLMs.

Conclusion: The Two Faces of Modern Artificial Intelligence

The distinction between training and inference lies at the heart of the current AI revolution. Training – computationally intensive, costly, and time-consuming – lays the foundation for the system's "intelligence" through massive data processing and complex parameter optimization. Inference, on the other hand – more efficient, faster, and more resource-efficient – ​​translates this intelligence into actionable form and enables the everyday AI experiences that we now take for granted.

This dichotomy explains not only the technical and economic aspects of AI development, but also the market dynamics and competition within the industry. Companies with access to enormous computing resources and data volumes dominate the training of advanced models, while a broader ecosystem of companies develops innovative applications through optimized inference.

Looking ahead, the boundaries between training and inference are likely to become more fluid. Continuous learning, personalized adaptation, and more efficient training methods could reduce the massive initial training costs, while more advanced inference methods such as in-context learning will improve the adaptability of pre-trained models.

For developers and companies working in the AI ​​field, understanding this duality remains crucial for strategic decisions: Where is it worthwhile to invest in in-house training? Which inference optimizations offer the greatest benefit? How can the balance between model size, performance, and efficiency be optimally achieved?

The answers to these questions will significantly shape not only technical development but also the economic and societal integration of artificial intelligence in the coming years. One thing is certain, however: The symbiotic relationship between resource-hungry training and elegant inference will continue to form the foundation upon which artificial intelligence transforms our world.

—

Ready for more content from Kim Isenberg? Subscribe to FF Daily for free!