👾 The Next AI Breakthrough Will Be Better Interfaces

AI has succeeded remarkably in domains where text is the native interface. Coding assistants, writing tools, and research platforms work well because LLMs are text-based systems operating in text-native environments. The interface matches the underlying technology.

But AI struggles when tasks require visual or interactive experiences. Ask an agent to analyze sales data, and you'll get paragraphs of text and (maybe) a vibe-coded graph that you have to triple check for accuracy. Request help with project planning, and you'll receive text-based task lists instead of visual timelines that show dependencies. We're forcing almost every interaction through the same interface, even when it doesn’t match how humans naturally process information.

Most AI products today operate like Google's old SMS search service. Before smartphones, you could text Google with queries like "dinner near 94107" and get restaurant recommendations via text message. It was technically impressive, but hardly anyone used it. The service didn't take off until Google Maps launched on the iPhone, because maps are inherently visual.

When you ask an agent to help with data visualization, it processes your request through sophisticated reasoning, but usually delivers results through text. Data analysis involves trend patterns, comparative metrics, and outlier identification—information that humans process much more effectively through charts and graphs than written descriptions.

This creates a translation problem. Systems generate intelligent solutions, then force them through an interface that obscures rather than clarifies the output.

Many use cases require visual or interactive experiences to be truly effective. Consider asking an agent to create a simple game like Tetris. Current systems will spend time compiling code and generating text-based previews; a better approach would recognize the request and offer to launch an existing game plugin immediately.

The same principle applies across software categories. Calendar tools need visual schedule displays. Data analysis requires charts and graphs. Design software demands interactive canvases. Developer environments benefit from syntax highlighting and visual debugging tools.

Humans are visual creatures. Our phone screens get larger every year, and computer monitors pack in more pixels, because visual information processing remains superior to text for many tasks. Interfaces that ignore this will always feel like they're working against rather than with users.

The shift toward better interfaces requires four changes in how we approach product development:

The most successful applications of the future will understand when to stay in text and when to break out into richer experiences. A data request might start as conversation but expand into interactive charts when analysis becomes complex. A project planning question might begin with text but shift to visual timelines when coordination becomes necessary.

This requires systems that recognize context and choose appropriate output formats instead of defaulting to text for every response. The next wave of products won't win by showcasing the most advanced models—they'll win by combining reasoning with interface design that matches how humans naturally work.

Companies that solve this interface challenge will build lasting competitive advantages. While models become increasingly commoditized, superior interfaces create user experiences that competitors struggle to replicate. Better interfaces generate more engaged users, which produces better training data, which improves performance—a virtuous cycle that compounds over time.

Technically impressive software isn't the same as genuinely helpful software. But when you make advanced technology feel effortless to use, that's when the experience feels like magic.